While cause-related marketing was a topic we only briefly discussed during our last lecture (as it is unfortunately often the case with most topics in an intro class), its growing presence in the corporate arena and its social and ethical implications make it almost mandatory to pause here and take a closer look. Cause marketing corporate spending has been steadily growing over the past couple of decades from only about $120 million in 1990, to $816 million in 2002, and $1.5 billion in 2009
[1]. There are several ways in which a company can tie itself and/or its products to a cause:
advertising, public relations, sponsorship, licensing, direct marketing, facilitated giving, and, the most popular,
purchase-triggered giving [2]. For this blog assignment you will learn about each one of these six main types as well as the many marketing, social, and ethical issues surrounding cause-related marketing by reading the following article that was published on prwatch.org:
"Cause-Related Marketing: Why Social Change and Corporate Profits Don't Mix" by Inger Stole
Important note about the article: Please be aware that in this article, Inger Stole uses the acronym CRM to refer to cause-related marketing, although, as you learned in this class, the acronym CRM is widely used to refer to customer relationship management.
After thoroughly reading the article, your assignment is to post here (as a comment) a minimum 10 line reaction to the information presented to you. Then you have to find and discuss a cause-related marketing example: identify which one of the six types it belongs to, was it a successful marketing endeavor for the company, how do you feel about it, was it cause-related or cause-exploitative. Your examples need to be different from those found by everyone else who posts their comments before you, so the earlier you complete the assignment the better. You also have to find examples different from those already presented in the article. If you find your example online, include the link for your source in the comment.
Sources:
[1]
http://www.causemarketingforum.com/page.asp?ID=188
[2]
http://www.prwatch.org/node/4965
www.yoplait.com